Replace by operator[], begin() and end(), which don't have overhead
since commit 2484de6728 (Remove non-
const Sequence::begin()/end() in internal code, 2021-10-15)
and commit fb3c04bd19 (Drop non-const
Sequence::operator[] in internal code, 2021-11-05).
Change-Id: I221470b3439bb0dc6e7705b0d99deb3cd2063484
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/195176
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Mike Kaganski <mike.kaganski@collabora.com>
...following up on 314f15bff0 "Extend
loplugin:external to warn about enums".
Cases where free functions were moved into an unnamed namespace along with a
class, to not break ADL, are in:
filter/source/svg/svgexport.cxx
sc/source/filter/excel/xelink.cxx
sc/source/filter/excel/xilink.cxx
svx/source/sdr/contact/viewobjectcontactofunocontrol.cxx
All other free functions mentioning moved classes appear to be harmless and not
give rise to (silent, even) ADL breakage. (One remaining TODO in
compilerplugins/clang/external.cxx is that derived classes are not covered by
computeAffectedTypes, even though they could also be affected by ADL-breakage---
but don't seem to be in any acutal case across the code base.)
For friend declarations using elaborate type specifiers, like
class C1 {};
class C2 { friend class C1; };
* If C2 (but not C1) is moved into an unnamed namespace, the friend declaration
must be changed to not use an elaborate type specifier (i.e., "friend C1;"; see
C++17 [namespace.memdef]/3: "If the name in a friend declaration is neither
qualified nor a template-id and the declaration is a function or an
elaborated-type-specifier, the lookup to determine whether the entity has been
previously declared shall not consider any scopes outside the innermost
enclosing namespace.")
* If C1 (but not C2) is moved into an unnamed namespace, the friend declaration
must be changed too, see <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71882>
"elaborated-type-specifier friend not looked up in unnamed namespace".
Apart from that, to keep changes simple and mostly mechanical (which should help
avoid regressions), out-of-line definitions of class members have been left in
the enclosing (named) namespace. But explicit specializations of class
templates had to be moved into the unnamed namespace to appease
<https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92598> "explicit specialization of
template from unnamed namespace using unqualified-id in enclosing namespace".
Also, accompanying declarations (of e.g. typedefs or static variables) that
could arguably be moved into the unnamed namespace too have been left alone.
And in some cases, mention of affected types in blacklists in other loplugins
needed to be adapted.
And sc/qa/unit/mark_test.cxx uses a hack of including other .cxx, one of which
is sc/source/core/data/segmenttree.cxx where e.g. ScFlatUInt16SegmentsImpl is
not moved into an unnamed namespace (because it is declared in
sc/inc/segmenttree.hxx), but its base ScFlatSegmentsImpl is. GCC warns about
such combinations with enabled-by-default -Wsubobject-linkage, but "The compiler
doesn’t give this warning for types defined in the main .C file, as those are
unlikely to have multiple definitions."
(<https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-9.2.0/gcc/Warning-Options.html>) The
warned-about classes also don't have multiple definitions in the given test, so
disable the warning when including the .cxx.
Change-Id: Ib694094c0d8168be68f8fe90dfd0acbb66a3f1e4
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/83239
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
Found with bin/find-unneeded-includes
Only removal proposals are dealt with here.
Change-Id: I23a6d485ee1ca0bc3801bcc1a6d748b8ed2b490c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/72634
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com>
V572 It is odd that the object which was created using 'new' operator
is immediately cast to another type.
Change-Id: I5fee1c4bebd1972fbb5e43da37149d4e2ff6ce0d
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/67664
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Mike Kaganski <mike.kaganski@collabora.com>
...warning about (for now only) functions and variables with external linkage
that likely don't need it.
The problems with moving entities into unnamed namespacs and breaking ADL
(as alluded to in comments in compilerplugins/clang/external.cxx) are
illustrated by the fact that while
struct S1 { int f() { return 0; } };
int f(S1 s) { return s.f(); }
namespace N {
struct S2: S1 { int f() { return 1; } };
int f(S2 s) { return s.f(); }
}
int main() { return f(N::S2()); }
returns 1, both moving just the struct S2 into an nunnamed namespace,
struct S1 { int f() { return 0; } };
int f(S1 s) { return s.f(); }
namespace N {
namespace { struct S2: S1 { int f() { return 1; } }; }
int f(S2 s) { return s.f(); }
}
int main() { return f(N::S2()); }
as well as moving just the function f overload into an unnamed namespace,
struct S1 { int f() { return 0; } };
int f(S1 s) { return s.f(); }
namespace N {
struct S2: S1 { int f() { return 1; } };
namespace { int f(S2 s) { return s.f(); } }
}
int main() { return f(N::S2()); }
would each change the program to return 0 instead.
Change-Id: I4d09f7ac5e8f9bcd6e6bde4712608444b642265c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/60539
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
(*) if we are already throwing a Wrapped*Exception, get the
exception using cppu::getCaughtexception.
(*) when catching and then immediately throwing UNO exceptions,
use cppu::getCaughtException to prevent exception slicing
(*) if we are going to catch an exception and then
immediately throw a RuntimeException, rather throw a
WrappedTargetRuntimeException and preserve the original exception information.
Change-Id: Ia7a501a50ae0e6f4d05186333c8517fdcb17d558
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/54692
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
The only effect SAL_CALL effectively has on LO-internal code is to change non-
static member functions from __thiscall to __cdecl in MSVC (where all other
functions are __cdecl by default, anyway). (For 3rd-party code, it could be
argued that SAL_CALL is useful on function declarations in the URE stable
interface other than non-static member functions, too, in case 3rd-party code
uses a compiler switch to change the default calling convention to something
other than __cdecl. But loplugin:salcall exempts the URE stable interface,
anyway.)
One could argue that SAL_CALL, even if today it effectively only affects non-
static member functions in MSVC, could be extended in the future to affect more
functions on more platforms. However, the current code would already not
support that. For example, 3af500580b
"loplugin:salcall fix functions" changed FrameControl_createInstance in
UnoControls/source/base/registercontrols.cxx to no longer be SAL_CALL, even
though its address (in ctl_component_getFacrory, in the same file) is passed to
cppuhelper::createSingleFactory as an argument of type
cppu::ComponentInstantiation, which is a pointer to SAL_CALL function.
Change-Id: I3acbf7314a3d7868ed70e35bb5c47bc11a0b7ff6
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/46436
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
Translates all (leftovers) found using a custom regex, in directories not
shown by /bin/find-german-comments and beginning with "e".
Additionally, following is translated:
- A help string in /extensions/test/ole/EventListenerSample/EventListener/EventListener.idl
Change-Id: Iff521ae1c4a616ed5a4ca79641a5cee6f380bee0
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/37836
Reviewed-by: Chris Sherlock <chris.sherlock79@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Chris Sherlock <chris.sherlock79@gmail.com>
...and remove some unncessary using directives/declarations, in preparation of
removing now-unnecessary #includes from cppumaker-generated files, post
e57ca02849 "Remove dynamic exception
specifications".
Change-Id: Iaf1f268871e2ee1d1c76cf90f03557527ebc9067
...(for now, from LIBO_INTERNAL_CODE only). See the mail thread starting at
<https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2017-January/076665.html>
"Dynamic Exception Specifications" for details.
Most changes have been done automatically by the rewriting loplugin:dynexcspec
(after enabling the rewriting mode, to be committed shortly). The way it only
removes exception specs from declarations if it also sees a definition, it
identified some dead declarations-w/o-definitions (that have been removed
manually) and some cases where a definition appeared in multiple include files
(which have also been cleaned up manually). There's also been cases of macro
paramters (that were used to abstract over exception specs) that have become
unused now (and been removed).
Furthermore, some code needed to be cleaned up manually
(avmedia/source/quicktime/ and connectivity/source/drivers/kab/), as I had no
configurations available that would actually build that code. Missing @throws
documentation has not been applied in such manual clean-up.
Change-Id: I3408691256c9b0c12bc5332de976743626e13960
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/33574
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
The issue of 362d4f0cd4 "Explicitly mark
overriding destructors as 'virtual'" appears to no longer be a problem with
MSVC 2013.
(The little change in the rewriting code of compilerplugins/clang/override.cxx
was necessary to prevent an endless loop when adding "override" to
OOO_DLLPUBLIC_CHARTTOOLS virtual ~CloseableLifeTimeManager();
in chart2/source/inc/LifeTime.hxx, getting stuck in the leading
OOO_DLLPUBLIC_CHARTTOOLS macro. Can't remember what that
isAtEndOfImmediateMacroExpansion thing was originally necessary for, anyway.)
Change-Id: I534c634504d7216b9bb632c2775c04eaf27e927e
A ridiculously fast way of doing this is:
for i in $(pcregrep -l -M -r --include='.*[hc]xx$' \
--exclude-dir=workdir --exclude-dir=instdir '^
{3,}' .)
do
perl -0777 -i -pe 's/^
{3,}/
/gm' $i
done
Change-Id: Iebb93eccbee9e4fc5c4380474ba595858a27ac2c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/22224
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Chris Sherlock <chris.sherlock79@gmail.com>