After recent commit 851fb75779
recheck these directories in include/ again
to test drive the new --headersfwd mode of bin/find-unneeded-includes
Change-Id: I0ede437c4f9958cd98210ed1760a5b98ea8bd1ad
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/192377
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Gabor Kelemen <gabor.kelemen@collabora.com>
I added the code that I remove here in commit
22d7827c66 (tdf#168569: support date
values in string pool, 2025-09-26), but this is section to handle
old images, after commit 3bcfb1aac1
(tdf#143707 - Change strategy to support suffix type characters,
2021-08-10) the suffixes are written in a way that is handled in
SbiImage::GetString.
Change-Id: Ia2ad05f1e146dc40686f2baf07f178331f1ff4a7
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/191561
Reviewed-by: Mike Kaganski <mike.kaganski@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins
Commit f45463d8e2 (tdf#93727 Support date
literals in basic, 2017-05-24) introduced correct parsing of literals
like #2025-09-26#. However, it didn't retain the value type; there was
a discussion about that in gerrit, but no solution was found, and type
was set to double.
Later, a similar problem (storing type of value in compiled image) was
fixed in commit 5eedb3beea (tdf#142460:
properly handle boolean values in string pool, 2021-06-25).
This change reuses the same method to store date type using 'd' char in
the string pool.
Change-Id: I32e8497ece1f30980ba6d4fca248687b817348f2
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/191555
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Mike Kaganski <mike.kaganski@collabora.com>
1. If a string is passed as argument, it is returned without any changes.
For that, SbRtl_Str checks argument type, skipping processing for string.
2. Non-negative numbers are preceded by a blank space.
That already was implemented.
3. Negative numbers are preceded by a minus sign.
That was done incorrectly - a space was added for any number.
4. Dates are converted into locale-dependent strings.
That wasn't done at all - dates were converted to strings representing
the serial date. A check is implemented SbxValue::Format, to handle this.
Additionally, Format function was improved to handle such input without
format string (taking into account that it handles strings that can be
converted to numbers differently).
Change-Id: I5ac0429950e4ea8bf69b0091502b4e6dc1f4957d
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/191549
Reviewed-by: Mike Kaganski <mike.kaganski@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins
Flattens function implementations by returning early when an argument
check fails rather than using if/else blocks.
Change-Id: I5adad466e41ac95ad5bde43d758babf5932ec304
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/187606
Reviewed-by: Mike Kaganski <mike.kaganski@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins
places where we are constructing a Graphic by first
converting to BitmapEx, which is unnecessary, rather pass a
Bitmap to Graphic.
Change-Id: I386f68e7f5bc6ef9509352187dbe9a0774defaac
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/190307
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
SbiRuntime::FindElement ends with a call to CheckArray(). The latter
takes a variable, checks if that is an array and if it has parameters;
and if both are true, tries to obtain an element of the array defined
by the parameters as array indexes (using SbxDimArray::Get).
The problem was, that the variable may actually be array; it may have
parameters; but this array can be the result of a function call; the
variable may be SbxMethod; and the parameters may be for the function,
not array indexes.
Specifically, the call like
Iif(True, Array("A","B"), Array("B","A"))
searched for an entity named Iif; found that it was a RTL method;
prepared the arguments for it (consisting of four elements: 0 - the
method itself; 1 - boolean True; 2 - array ["A", "B"]; 3 - array
["B", "A"]); the function executed, putting the correct value to the
params[0], which was the method itself (so its value became an array);
and finally, the SbxMethod variable with the array value got passed
to CheckArray. The latter found out that it's an array, and that it
has parameters (those four) - and tried to get the element, which
index was defined by the parameters.
Here comes the specifics of LibreOffice Basic's argument handling.
SbxDimArray::Get only cares about first arguments expected by the
array dimensions; it ignores the rest. Since the array was single-
dimensional, it only considered parameter 1 (parameter 0 is, by
convention, reserved for return value). That was a boolean. When it
was False, its GetInteger returned 0; and finally, CheckArray took
element 0 from the array, returning a scalar value, as if it was
Iif(False, Array("A","B"), Array("B","A"))(0)
But when the boolean was True, another Basic specific took place:
its numerical value is -1; and trying to get element -1 from the
array resulted in "Index out of defined range".
This change disambiguates between the cases of array index, and
function parameters, checking if the variable itself, and its 0th
parameter are both SbxMethods. Then it doesn't try to treat the
parameters as indexes into the array.
Change-Id: I597f94a7e688c8bba12d87a1bd5871491c25cac0
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/187145
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Mike Kaganski <mike.kaganski@collabora.com>
Avoids the need to convert between OUString and OString;
and resolves a pressing Win16 compatibility issue.
Change-Id: I4cf5b6962050181a66a33c1261c9440ac7a39b82
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/183487
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Mike Kaganski <mike.kaganski@collabora.com>
If BASIC function NOW is called with the wrong number of arguments,
then return error code 5 (Invalid procedure call).
Change-Id: I123f316e36e6726a2cfc9d1e53664ce632af1289
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/181303
Reviewed-by: Mike Kaganski <mike.kaganski@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins
we can just take a "const &".
(found by running clang-tidy with the
performance-unnecessary-copy-initialization warning)
Change-Id: I20fd208c65303da78170b1ac06c638fdf3aa094b
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/176267
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Jenkins
Ludwig Temmel